Why Context Technology Who We Build For Research Current Status Roadmap Company Blog Request Demo
Architecture Overview

System Architecture

All processing happens on-device. No video frames, images, or analysis results leave the device. Privacy is enforced at the architecture level.

InputVideo frame or image from camera
Context Intelligence LayerScene analysis · Activity recognition · Relationship understanding · Intent assessment
Risk ScoringConfidence calculation · Harm indicators · Contextual risk
Decision LogicContext + Risk assessment · Policy application · Explainable output
OutputDecision + Reasoning (all on-device)
Privacy Guarantee

Zero Data Transmission

No video frames, images, analysis results, or decisions are transmitted to any external server. The entire pipeline runs in device memory.

In Development

On-Device Inference

The inference engine will run fully on-device — model training begins Q4 2026. No network connection required, by design.

Research

Edge Optimization

Model optimization for lower-power edge devices is in the research phase. Target: 2027.

Core Component

Context Intelligence Layer

The core component that transforms raw visual input into a rich semantic understanding of what is happening in the scene.

What It Analyzes

Scene type and settingWedding, gym, office, hospital, street, bedroom
Activity and event contextCelebration, sport, medical, recreation, education
Relationship type inferenceCouple, family, professional, strangers
Intent signal detectionDocumentation, art, intimacy, surveillance indicators
Age and safety factorsVulnerability indicators, consent context

Current vs. In Development

Framework dimensions definedScene, activity, relationship, intent, platform, risk
Annotation schema13 fields per scenario in the CKB
Decision logicDemonstrated through prototype examples
Inference engineReal ML model training begins Q4 2026
Model validationWith design partner data — 8–12 weeks per partner
Risk Assessment

Risk Scoring

Multi-dimensional risk assessment that combines traditional pixel-based signals with context-driven modifiers to produce a nuanced risk score — not a binary classification.

R.01

Pixel-Based Detection

Standard visual signals: skin tone, exposure, proximity. These are inputs to the risk model — not the decision itself.

R.02

Context-Driven Modifiers

Event type, relationship, platform. These adjust the interpretation of pixel-based signals dramatically.

R.03

Policy-Driven Thresholds

What counts as harmful is defined by platform policy — not by a single universal threshold applied to all contexts.

Why We're Not Publishing Numbers Yet

We have validated our approach on prototype scenarios. We are not publishing specific accuracy, latency, or false-positive rate numbers until we have validated at scale with enterprise design partners and completed peer review. Numbers without context mislead. Fairness validation requires diverse populations. Benchmarks should be peer-reviewed.

Validation Status

What We've Validated

Transparent accounting of what has been tested and what has not.

Validated in Prototype

Context intelligence approachFramework validated through 55-scenario research
Decision logicDemonstrated through prototype examples
Explainable decision formatReasoning output designed and demonstrated
On-device architectureZero-transmission design — implementation with real model

Not Yet Validated at Scale

Large-scale accuracy metricsRequires enterprise pilot data
Latency at production loadNot tested at enterprise scale
Demographic fairness metricsRequires diverse population study
Peer-reviewed benchmarksIn progress — academic partnership stage